Economic and Industrial Democracy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 23, No. 4, 491-528 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0143831X02234003

Worker Participation and Teams: New Evidence from Analyzing Organizational Ethnographies

Randy Hodson

Ohio State University

Most large organizations are today experimenting with heightened employee involvement, including self-monitoring teams, joint programs with unions and limited degrees of worker ownership such as those based on employee stock ownership programs. In spite of the widespread adoption of such programs, relatively little is known about their consequences for employee behavior and attitudes. In particular, little is known about the relative strengths and limitations of different programs. The current article evaluates a range of programs involving heightened employee involvement using data derived from content coding program characteristics, worker behaviors and worklife experiences from the existing set of book length organizational ethnographies (N = 122). The results suggest that all forms of worker participation offer improved worklife experiences and reduced workplace conflict relative to the absence of these programs. Self-monitoring teams, however, perform no better than joint union-management programs or than more traditional work teams along the dimensions of worker autonomy, pride, satisfaction and cooperation. The sole unique contribution of contemporary self-monitoring teams appears to be a lowering of strike probabilities.

Key Words: employee involvement • organizational ethnography • teams • work groups • worker participation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
D. C. Strubler and K. M. York
An Exploratory Study of the Team Characteristics Model Using Organizational Teams
Small Group Research, December 1, 2007; 38(6): 670 - 695.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
S. Kalliola
Confronting a Changing Economy: Union Responses in Finland
Economic and Industrial Democracy, May 1, 2005; 26(2): 257 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]