Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic and Industrial Democracy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pruijt, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Teams between Neo-Taylorism and Anti-Taylorism

Hans Pruijt

Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam

Team working is of ten associated with sophisticated management control and inten-sification of work; however, many authors suggest that an alternative type exists to which this does not apply. One of the problems in the teams discussion is a confusion about terminology. The Toyota production system was relabelled 'team working'to increase its acceptability. Also, team working was used as a metonym for industrial democracy in order to increase its appeal to managers. A second problem is determinism: a tendency to prematurely lock different types of team working into different fields of production. This article presents a systematic, empirically grounded typology of team working. Neo-Tayloristic and anti-Tayloristic team working are contrasted to classical Taylorism. Neo-Tayloristic and anti-Tayloristic teamworking both entail intensification of work. However, autonomy in anti-Tayloristic team working is real; there is little evidence of a 'brave new teams'scenario. Neo-Tayloristic team working builds on the strengths of Taylorism. For anti-Tayloristic team working, the opportunity structure is less favourable; improving it remains a challenge.

Key Words: industrial democracy • sociotechnical systems design • Taylorism • team working • Toyota production system

Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 24, No. 1, 77-101 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0143831X03241004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
H.-k. Kwon
Japanese Employment Relations in Transition
Economic and Industrial Democracy, August 1, 2004; 25(3): 325 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]