Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic and Industrial Democracy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hasle, P.
Right arrow Articles by Møller, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Agreements between Labour Unions and Employers’ Associations as a Strategy for the Prevention of Repetitive Strain Injury

Peter Hasle

Nanette Juhler Hansen

Niels Møller

Technical University of Denmark

In 1992 the Danish labour unions and employers’ associations entered into an agreement on an action plan against hazardous repetitive work. The ambitious goal of this government-supported plan was to reduce hazardous repetitive work by 50 percent by the year 2000. An assessment of the effect of the plan reveals that in spite of certain shortcomings the plan did bring about a reduction of repetitive work, though the goal of a 50 percent reduction was not accomplished. One may draw the important lesson that agreements between the labour market parties need substantial backing from the authorities in order to be effective; otherwise, both the labour unions and employers’ associations will have dif.culties in enforcing obligations on their members. This is especially the case if companies that are either passive or outright negatively disposed are to be covered as well. But if the three parties cooperate, a strategy based on agreements seems to be a valuable approach to the solution of those working environment problems that are dif.cult to regulate by clear and measurable standards.

Key Words: assessment • collective agreements • regulation strategy • repetitive work • working environment

Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 25, No. 1, 75-101 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0143831X04040102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
P. Hasle and N. Moller
From Conflict to Shared Development: Social Capital in a Tayloristic Environment
Economic and Industrial Democracy, August 1, 2007; 28(3): 401 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]