Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Economic and Industrial Democracy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellem, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dialectics of Scale: Global Capital and Local Unions in Australia’s Iron Ore Industry

Bradon Ellem

University of Sydney

For over five years, Western Australia’s Pilbara iron ore mining region has been the site of a series of intense struggles over worker representation. Thus far, unions have avoided a repeat of defeats suffered in the 1980s and 1990s. Indeed, new forms of local interaction have emerged alongside new kinds of union structures. To explain these developments, this article goes beyond mainstream industrial relations scholarship and draws from the work of human geographers. By focusing on the making of space, it is possible to make clear the meanings of these particular intersections of the local, State, national and global scales. In so doing, three dialectical tensions are addressed: those within the ‘local-global’ structuring of this productive space; those within the interplay of national and local union settings; and also between these processes. Neither scale nor space itself is hierarchical. No one scale - local or global - can be accorded priority. Nor can any one space - the workplace or the town - be thought of without the other.

Key Words: community • mining • Pilbara • place • scale • unions

Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 26, No. 3, 335-358 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0143831X05054739
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Labor Studies JournalHome page
A. Tattersall
A Little Help from Our Friends: Exploring and Understanding when Labor-Community Coalitions Are Likely to Form
Labor Studies Journal, December 1, 2009; 34(4): 485 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Labor Studies JournalHome page
R. Cooper, B. Ellem, C. Briggs, and D. van den Broek
Anti-unionism, Employer Strategy, and the Australian State, 1996-2005
Labor Studies Journal, September 1, 2009; 34(3): 339 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
N. Gunningham
Occupational Health and Safety, Worker Participation and the Mining Industry in a Changing World of Work
Economic and Industrial Democracy, August 1, 2008; 29(3): 336 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 JIRHome page
R. Paulet
Location Matters: The Impact of Place on Call Centres
Journal of Industrial Relations, April 1, 2008; 50(2): 305 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]