This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Forde, C. Articles by Spencer, D. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Fearing the Worst? Threat, Participation and Workplace Productivity

Leeds University Business School

Gary Slater

University of Bradford

David A. Spencer

Leeds University Business School

This article investigates the impact of the threat of job loss and participation on productivity using data from the 1998 British Workplace Employee Relations Survey. Threat and participation have often been seen as alternative devices for motivation: the former based on coercion, the latter based on cooperation. The study examines whether there are any joint effects between the two. Specifically, does the impact of participation on workplace productivity vary according to the threat of job loss? The study finds little evidence of a direct effect of the threat of job loss on productivity, but strong support is found for the notion that worker participation can enhance productivity. This effect is found not to be affected by local unemployment but it is observed that the joint presence of participation and other ‘threat’ variables measuring the level of supervision do impact on productivity outcomes.

Key Words: coercion • cooperation • participation • productivity • threat of job loss • unemployment

Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 27, No. 3, 369-398 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0143831X06065961


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?